Head to head
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $2.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M tokens | $6.00 | $4.25 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| WM Score | 89 | 87 |
| Benchmark quality | 91.7 | 88 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 1 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 31 | 116 |
| Latency (ms) | 1479 | 4200 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 costs less per million input tokens — about 1.6× cheaper than Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max. Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on measured quality. Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.