Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $0.140 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $0.280 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| WM Score | 86 | 80 |
| Benchmark quality | 87.5 | 70.9 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 5 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 82 | 33 |
| Latency (ms) | 2941 | 1175 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 costs less per million input tokens — about 8.9× cheaper than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on measured quality. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.