Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra Openai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $5.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $25.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| WM Score | 86 | 86 |
| Benchmark quality | 87.6 | 90.3 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 2 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 73 | 53 |
| Latency (ms) | 2866 | 2338 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 costs less per million input tokens — about 4.0× cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra scores higher on measured quality. OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.