Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Z Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $0.250 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| WM Score | 89 | 89 |
| Benchmark quality | 91.1 | 83.6 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 26 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 84 | 130 |
| Latency (ms) | 4426 | 537 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash costs less per million input tokens — about 16.7× cheaper than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on measured quality. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.