Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 Z Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $0.966 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $3.04 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| WM Score | 87 | 83 |
| Benchmark quality | 87.8 | 79.9 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 26 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 62 | 163 |
| Latency (ms) | 3089 | 333 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 costs less per million input tokens — about 1.3× cheaper than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on measured quality. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.