Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | Z.ai: GLM 5 Z Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $0.600 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $1.92 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 205K |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| WM Score | 86 | 81 |
| Benchmark quality | 87.5 | 76.7 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 10 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 75 | 93.5 |
| Latency (ms) | 2863 | 792 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5 costs less per million input tokens — about 2.1× cheaper than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on measured quality. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.