Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Anthropic: Claude Fable 5
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $10.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $50.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| WM Score | 88 | 88 |
| Benchmark quality | 90.2 | 90.4 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 5 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 81 | 58 |
| Latency (ms) | 2324 | 4479 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 costs less per million input tokens — about 8.0× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Fable 5. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 scores higher on measured quality. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.