Head to head
Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Meta | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25 | $2.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.25 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| WM Score | 85 | 83 |
| Benchmark quality | 85.3 | 82.4 |
| Hosts serving it | 1 | 1 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 154 | 38 |
| Latency (ms) | 2484 | 1322 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 costs less per million input tokens — about 1.6× cheaper than Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max. Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on measured quality. Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.