Head to head
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Xai | Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash Google Ai Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $2.00 | $0.750 |
| Output $/M tokens | $6.00 | $3.75 |
| Context window | 500K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 450K | 66K |
| WM Score | 88 | 88 |
| Benchmark quality | 91.5 | 86.9 |
| Hosts serving it | 2 | 2 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 55 | 149 |
| Latency (ms) | 1291 | 2460 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less per million input tokens — about 2.7× cheaper than SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6. SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 scores higher on measured quality. Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.