Head to head
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Openai | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 Z Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $0.200 | $0.966 |
| Output $/M tokens | $1.20 | $3.04 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| WM Score | 87 | 85 |
| Benchmark quality | 83.7 | 82.5 |
| Hosts serving it | 3 | 27 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 99.5 | 223 |
| Latency (ms) | 865 | 296 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna costs less per million input tokens — about 4.8× cheaper than Z.ai: GLM 5.2. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on measured quality. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.