Head to head
Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5 Z Ai | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Google |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $0.600 | $0.750 |
| Output $/M tokens | $1.92 | $3.75 |
| Context window | 205K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| WM Score | 81 | 82 |
| Benchmark quality | 76.7 | 79 |
| Hosts serving it | 10 | 2 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 67 | 213 |
| Latency (ms) | 911 | 1264 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5 costs less per million input tokens — about 1.3× cheaper than Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash. Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on measured quality. Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.