Head to head
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Z Ai | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Deepseek |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $1.40 | $0.150 |
| Output $/M tokens | $4.40 | $0.600 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 944K | 384K |
| WM Score | 89 | 81 |
| Benchmark quality | 88.5 | 72 |
| Hosts serving it | 27 | 7 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 110 | 133 |
| Latency (ms) | 509 | 953 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less per million input tokens — about 9.3× cheaper than Z.ai: GLM 5.3. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 scores higher on measured quality. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.