Head to head
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Z Ai | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $0.075 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M tokens | $0.250 | $4.25 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| WM Score | 95 | 87 |
| Benchmark quality | 93.1 | 88 |
| Hosts serving it | 12 | 1 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 130 | 72 |
| Latency (ms) | 727 | 5595 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash costs less per million input tokens — about 16.7× cheaper than Meta: Muse Spark 1.2. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on measured quality. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.