Head to head
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 Z Ai | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $0.966 | $2.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $3.04 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| WM Score | 83 | 83 |
| Benchmark quality | 79.9 | 82.4 |
| Hosts serving it | 26 | 1 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 138 | 38 |
| Latency (ms) | 351 | 1777 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 costs less per million input tokens — about 2.1× cheaper than Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max. Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on measured quality. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.