Head to head
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Google | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $0.375 | $3.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $1.88 | $15.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| WM Score | 88 | 81 |
| Benchmark quality | 87 | 76.5 |
| Hosts serving it | 2 | 5 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 178 | 62 |
| Latency (ms) | 2200 | 1051 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less per million input tokens — about 8.0× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6. Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on measured quality. Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.