Head to head
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $2.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M tokens | $10.00 | $4.25 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 944K |
| WM Score | 86 | 86 |
| Benchmark quality | 82.9 | 87.6 |
| Hosts serving it | 5 | 1 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 82.5 | 73 |
| Latency (ms) | 814 | 2860 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 costs less per million input tokens — about 1.6× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on measured quality. Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.