Head to head
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 Deepseek |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00 | $0.440 |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00 | $1.32 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 384K |
| WM Score | 86 | 85 |
| Benchmark quality | 85.3 | 81 |
| Hosts serving it | 5 | 18 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 77 | 84 |
| Latency (ms) | 797 | 617 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less per million input tokens — about 11.4× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on measured quality. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.