Head to head
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | Z.ai: GLM 5 Z Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00 | $1.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00 | $3.20 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 205K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| WM Score | 84 | 81 |
| Benchmark quality | 82.5 | 76.6 |
| Hosts serving it | 5 | 11 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 40 | 101 |
| Latency (ms) | 1768 | 693 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
Z.ai: GLM 5 costs less per million input tokens — about 5.0× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on measured quality. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.