Head to head
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra
Live prices, context windows, capabilities, and measured quality — updated continuously.
Side by side
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 Anthropic | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Openai |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/M tokens | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/M tokens | $50.00 | $12.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| WM Score | 91 | 89 |
| Benchmark quality | 94.8 | 90.5 |
| Hosts serving it | 5 | 3 |
| Throughput (tok/s) | 53 | 60 |
| Latency (ms) | 3512 | 940 |
| Vision | ||
| Tools | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| JSON mode |
Which should you pick?
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra costs less per million input tokens — about 5.0× cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Fable 5. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 scores higher on measured quality. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra takes a larger context window, which matters for long documents or big codebases. Prices here are live list prices; the same model can cost less on a different host, so check the model page for the cheapest offering.